Hue University Journal of Science: Agriculture and Rural Development
http://222.255.146.83/index.php/hujos-ard
<p><strong>ISSN (Print) 2588-1191 </strong></p> <p><strong>ISSN (Online) 2615-9708</strong></p> <p><strong>Editor in chief: </strong>Tran Van Giang</p> <p><strong>Academic Editor: </strong>Huynh Van Chuong</p> <p><strong>Technical Editor: </strong>Nguyen Quoc Thien Huong</p> <p><strong>Phone:</strong> 02343845658 | <strong>Email: </strong>nguyenquocthienhuong@hueuni.edu.vn</p>Hue Universityen-USHue University Journal of Science: Agriculture and Rural Development2588-1191Current situation and implications to enhance rural youth’s access to land: a case study in Hue city
http://222.255.146.83/index.php/hujos-ard/article/view/8109
<p>This study examines the barriers to land access and land use among rural youth in Vietnam’s mountainous areas, drawing on interviews with 100 young people, two focus group discussions, and eight key-informant interviews conducted in Long Quang commune, Hue city. The findings indicate that youth face substantial challenges in land access, particularly financial constraints, fragmented landholdings, and limited awareness of opportunities to participate in land policy processes at the grassroots level. Although they acknowledge the importance of land legislation and view recent administrative reforms positively—reflecting the State’s efforts in legal dissemination, but most remain indifferent or disengaged. This results in a persistent gap between policy intentions and practical needs, and constrains the voice of young people in land governance. Building on these insights, the study proposes four key directions: (i) Expanding credit schemes and land-support mechanisms for youth entrepreneurship; (ii) Enhancing youth involvement in resource planning and management; (iii) Strengthening land-law communication through digital platforms; and (iv) Promoting a more transparent, accessible, and youth-friendly administrative system.</p>Nguyen Tien NhatNguyen Huu NguTran Thi PhuongThi Yen Tho Truong
Copyright (c) 2026
2026-03-312026-03-311353A193210.26459/hueunijard.v135i3A.8109Growth and biomass yield of tropical grass varieties across seasons in Hue city
http://222.255.146.83/index.php/hujos-ard/article/view/7979
<p>Five tropical grass varieties—Ruzi, Mulato II, Purple, Mombasa, and Mun River—imported from Thailand were cultivated in Hue city to evaluate their growth performance and biomass yield across multiple harvests during the year. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design (Randomized Complete Block Design-RCBD) with four replications for each variety. The establishing period lasted 105 days after sowing the seeds, and subsequent regrowth harvests were carried out at 45-day intervals. Monitoring from September 2022 to December 2023 (one initial harvest and eight regrowth harvests) revealed significant differences in growth and biomass yield among the varieties (p<0.05). Purple, Mombasa, and Mun River had greater plant heights than Ruzi and Mulato II, whereas Ruzi and Mulato II produced more leaves and tillers (p<0.05). Biomass yields of Mombasa, Mun River, and Purple were higher than those of Mulato II and Ruzi (p<0.05). Growth and biomass yield were higher during the dry season (March–September) and lower during the wet season (October–February). The nutritional composition (on a dry matter basis) ranged from 6.97–10.53% Crude Protein (CP), 68.58–73.44% Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), 34.69–43.63% Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF), and 9.50–12.61% Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL).</p>Tran Ngoc LiemNgo Mau DungLe Minh DucDuong Thanh HaiVo Thi Minh TamVu Thi Minh PhuongLe Van AnSongyos ChotchutimaPhoompong Boonsaen
Copyright (c) 2025
2026-03-312026-03-311353A5–185–1810.26459/hueunijard.v135i3A.7979Classification of potential soil erosion on agricultural land and mountainous farmer’ perceptions of soil erosion in Hue city
http://222.255.146.83/index.php/hujos-ard/article/view/8214
<p>This study was conducted in the mountainous area of the former Phu Loc District, Hue City, to assess potential soil erosion using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and to examine local perceptions of this phenomenon based on interview data from 40 agricultural households. The results indicate that potential soil erosion was mainly concentrated in severity classes IV (200–400 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) and V (400–800 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), accounting for 62.76% of the total study area. At the 90% confidence level, a difference was found between Kinh and Co Tu respondents in their ability to correctly identify soil erosion; confusion between soil erosion and landslides was relatively common, particularly among the Co Tu group. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between ethnic groups in identifying the causes and consequences of soil erosion. In terms of gender, no significant difference was found in recognizing the erosion phenomenon itself, whereas statistically significant differences were detected between men and women in identifying its causes and consequences. The study recommends increasing land cover in combination with community communication using accessible language and field-based demonstrations to improve awareness and support the selection of appropriate farming practices.</p>Tung Pham GiaNhu Ngo YChau Tran Thi Minh
Copyright (c) 2026
2026-03-312026-03-311353A10.26459/hueunijard.v135i3A.8214