ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TYPICAL SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT MODELS IN SELECTED PROVINCES OF VIETNAM
PDF

Keywords

sustainable land management
economic analysis
Hoa Binh
Quang Tri
Can Tho

Abstract

Abstract: This study undertakes an economic analysis of selected sustainable land management (SLM) models in three selected provinces: Hoa Binh province in the Northwestern Mountainous region, Quang Tri province in the North Central Coast and Can Tho province in the Mekong Delta. The SLM models in Hoa Binh province are agroforestry models and those in the provinces of Quang Tri and Can Tho are annual crop rotations and intercropping with improved cultivation methods. The present study uses primary data from a multipurpose survey of 826 farm households. The results show that the agroforestry systems in Hoa Binh province are not financially attractive to farmers as their net returns are low, but their off-site benefit of soil erosion reduction in terms of safe removal and dumping cost of sediment is remarkable, about VND 300,000–320,000 per hectare per year. The SLM models in Hai Lang district (Quang Tri) are profitable with a much higher net return than that of prevailing non-SLM model with cassava mono-cropping. For Can Tho province, the SLM models with rice and upland crop rotations have significantly higher net returns than those of the triple-rice rotation model. However, the profitability of the studied SLM models is significantly affected by the risks associated with poor development or lack of outlet markets. Enhancing farmers’ agribusiness knowledge making them be able to deal with risks in the adoption of SLM models is of vital importance.

Keywords: sustainable land management economic analysis, Hoa Binh, Quang Tri, Can Tho

 

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jed.v128i5B.5068
PDF

References

  1. Guong, V. T., Khoi, C. M. and Dung, N. M (2010), Soil organic matter quality and nitrogen supplying capacity in continuously triple rice and rice-upland crop rotation systems, Scientific Journal of Can Tho University, 16b, 147‒154.
  2. MARD (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) (2006), Vietnam National Report on the UNCCD Implementation 2006, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  3. MONRE (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment) (2012), National strategy for environmental protection until 2020 and vision toward 2030, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  4. Pannell, D. J., Llewellyn, R. S., and Corbeels, M. (2014), The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 187(1), 52–64.
  5. Quyet, V. M., Bao, L. Q., Frossard, E. and Vlek P.L.G. (2014), Socioeconomic and biophysical determinants of land degradation in Vietnam: An integrated causal analysis at the national level, Land Use Policy, 36, 605‒617.
  6. Toan, P. V., Sebesvari. Z., Bläsing, M., Rosendahl, I. and Renaud, F. G. (2013), Pesticide management and their residues in sediments and surface and drinking water in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, Sci Total Environ, 2013 May 1; 452–453, 28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
  7. Viet, N. Q., Thuan, L. D., Nam, N. N. (2014), Initial establishment of soil degradation map proposed by WOCAT at communes in Ha Lang District, Quang Tri Province, Journal of Science and Technology, Hue University,1 (1), 124–134.
  8. VNFOREST (2016), Forest Protection Management and Desertification combating in period 2011–2015 and orientation 2016–2020.
  9. World Bank (2006), Sustainable Land Management, Washington DC, USA.
  10. World Bank (2008), Sustainable land management sourcebook, Washington DC, USA.
  11. Young, A., Menz. K., Muraya. P. and Smith. C. (1998), SCUAF Version 4: A model to estimate soil changes under agriculture, agroforestry and forestry, ACIAR Technical Reports Series, 41, 49.