CUSTOMER PERCEPTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF CHATBOTS IN CUSTOMER SERVICE: CASE STUDY AT VNPT HUE
Vol. 134 No. 5D (2025), Original Article
Vol. 134 No. 5D (2025)

CUSTOMER PERCEPTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF CHATBOTS IN CUSTOMER SERVICE: CASE STUDY AT VNPT HUE

Original Article
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v134i5D.7650
Published 2025-04-02
Nguyen Thi Thuy Đat
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
Bui Thi Thanh Nga
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Phuong Thao
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam

Keywords

Nhận thức, chatbot, viễn thông. Perception, chatbots, telecommunications.

Abstract

The authors conducting this research aim to explore consumer acceptance of chatbots in customer service in VNPT Hue. Based on data collected from 185 users through a convenience sampling approach, the study utilized SPSS 20.0 software to perform descriptive statistical analysis. The results indicate that consumers have a relatively positive perception of chatbots, and there are four factors influencing the chatbot adoption. Certain administrative implications are proposed to help increase awareness and use of chatbot services in the telecommunications industry.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v134i5D.7650

References

  1. Mindbrowser (2017), Chatbot Survey 2017. Retrived 20/7/2024, from http://mindbowser.com/chatbot-market-survey-2017/. (Accessed 22 March 2020)
  2. Chen, J.-S., Le, T.-T.-Y. and Florence, D. (2021), Usability and responsiveness of artificial intelligence chatbot on online customer experience in e-retailing, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 49(11), 1512–1531, doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0312.
  3. Mero, J. (2018), The effects of two-way communication and chat service usage on consumer attitudes in the E-commerce retailing sector, Electronic market, 28(2), 295–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0281-2.
  4. Chung, M., Ko, E., Joung, H. and Kim, S. J. (2018), Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands, Journal of Business Research, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.004.
  5. Chatbots Magazine (2019), Chatbot Report 2019: Global Trends and Analysis. Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://chatbotsmagazine.com/chatbot-report-2019-global-trends-and-analysis-a487afec05b.
  6. We Are Social (2024), Digital 2024: 5 billion social media users, Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/.
  7. Brandtzaeg, P. B. and Følstad, A. (2017), Why people use chatbots, In International Conference on Internet Science, Springer, Cham, 377–392.
  8. Zumstein, D., & Hundertmark, S. (2017), Chatbots—An Interactive Technology for Personalized Communication, Transactions and Services, IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 15, 96–109.
  9. Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2023), Understanding the user satisfaction and loyalty of customer service chatbots, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103211.
  10. Rese, A., Ganster, L., & Baier, D. (2020), Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance?, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102176.
  11. Haugeland, I. K. F., Følstad, A., Taylor, C., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2022), Understanding the user experience of customer service chatbots: An experimental study of chatbot interaction design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 161, 102788.
  12. Bowman, R., Cooney, O., Newbold, J. W., Thieme, A., Clark, L., Doherty, G., & Cowan, B. (2024), Exploring how politeness impacts the user experience of chatbots for mental health support, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 184, 103181.
  13. Cheng, X., Bao, Y., Zarifis, A., Gong, W., & Mou, J. (2021), Exploring consumers' response to text-based chatbots in e-commerce: the moderating role of task complexity and chatbot disclosure, Internet Research, 32(2), 496–517.
  14. Nguyen, D. M., Chiu, Y. T. H., & Le, H. D. (2021), Determinants of continuance intention towards banks’ chatbot services in Vietnam: A necessity for sustainable development, Sustainability, 13(14), 7625.
  15. Le, X. C. (2023), Research on the factors influencing customers' intention to use chatbots: A perspective from Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 18(5), 33–47. DOI:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.18.5.2407.2023.
  16. Nguyen, M. T. & Dinh, V. H. T. (2023), Study on the factors influencing customer acceptance of AI Chatbots at several commercial banks, Retrived 20/7/2024 from https://tapchinganhang.gov.vn/nghien-cuu-cac-yeu-to-tac-dong-den-su-chap-nhan-chatbot-ai-cua-khach-hang-tai-mot-so-ngan-hang-thuon.htm.
  17. Nguyen, T. K. C., Vu, H. N. & Tran, D. H. (2023), Study on the impact of AI Chatbots on online consumer repurchase behavior, Journal of Banking Science and Training, 259(12), 48–57.
  18. Baier, D., Rese, A., & Röglinger, M. (2018), Conversational User Interfaces for Online Shops? A Categorization of Use Cases, In ICIS, Retrived 20/7/2024 from https://www.fim-rc.de/Paperbibliothek/Veroeffentlicht/822/wi-822.pdf
  19. IBM (2024), What is chatbot, Retrived 20/7/2024 from https://www.ibm.com/topics/chatbots#:~:text=A%20chatbot%20is%20a%20computer,and%20automate%20responses%20to%20them.
  20. Thomaz, F., Salge, C., Karahanna, E. and Hulland, J. (2020), Learning from the dark web: leveraging conversational agents in the era of hyper-privacy to enhance marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 43–63, doi: 10.1007/s11747-019-00704-3.
  21. Wünderlich, N. V., Heinonen, K., Ostrom, A. L., Patricio, L., Sousa, R., Voss, C., & Lemmink, J. G. (2015), Futurizing smart service: implications for service researchers and managers, Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 442–447.
  22. Accenture (2018), Why Chatbots Are Key to the Future of Customer Experience, Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-digital-customer-service-Chatbots.
  23. Kotler, P. & Amstrong, G. (2017), Principles of Marketing, 17th ed., Pearson Education, Harlow.
  24. Solomon, M. R. (2019), Consumer Behavior Buying, Having, and Being, 15th ed, Pearson.
  25. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989), Technology acceptance model, J Manag Sci, 35(8), 982–1003, Later, Venkatesh and Davis (1996).
  26. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996), A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decision sciences, 27(3), 451–481.
  27. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001), Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model, MIS quarterly, 351–370.
  28. Davis, F. D. (1989), Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205, 219. Davis et al., 1992.
  29. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992), Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1, Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
  30. Rajaobelina, L., Prom Tep, S., Arcand, M., & Ricard, L. (2021), Creepiness: Its antecedents and impact on loyalty when interacting with a chatbot, Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2339–2356.
  31. Sarkar, S., Chauhan, S., & Khare, A. (2020), A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce, International Journal of Information Management, 50, 286–301.
  32. Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2020), I, Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents, Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101473.
  33. Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005), What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Information & management, 42(5), 719–729.
  34. Venkatesh, V. (2000), Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342–365.
  35. Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2007), Online buying innovativeness: effects of perceived value, perceived risk and perceived enjoyment, International journal of Business and Society, 8(2), 81.
  36. Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Waheed, A., Khan, M. S., & Farrukh, M. (2019), Customers’ expectation, satisfaction, and repurchase intention of used products online: Empirical evidence from China, Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019846212.
  37. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995), An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of management review, 20(3), 709–734.
  38. Morgan, R. M. (1994), The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing.
  39. Zarmpou, T., Saprikis, V., Markos, A., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2012), Modeling users’ acceptance of mobile services, Electronic Commerce Research, 12, 225–248.
  40. Følstad, A., & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2017), Chatbots and the new world of HCI. interactions, 24(4), 38–42.
  41. Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015), Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust, Human factors, 57(3), 407–434.
  42. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (2017), The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation, Interpersonal development, 57–89.
  43. Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002), An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors, Journal of the academy of marketing science, 30, 184–201.
  44. Kokkinou, A., & Cranage, D. A. (2015), Why wait? Impact of waiting lines on self-service technology use, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1181–1197.
  45. Pereira, T., Limberger, P. F., & Ardigó, C. M. (2021), The moderating effect of the need for interaction with a service employee on purchase intention in chatbots, Telematics and Informatics Reports, 1, 100003.
  46. Kayak (2017), Mobile Travel Report, Retrived 20/7/2024 from https://www.kayak.de/news/wp-con-tent/uploads/2017/05/DE_Report-compressed-1.pdf.
  47. LivePerson, (2017), How Consumers View Bots in Customer Care, Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://docsend.com/view/826nkc4.
  48. YouGov, (2017), Communication via chatbot: Are your customers ready for the next level of customer service?. Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/r/52/YouGov_Report_Kommunikation_per_Chatbot.pdf?mkt_tok¼eyJpIjoiT1RSak5qWTJPV1l5TXpFMyIsInQiOiIzK1YwWjJrRVJEYWErcExcL29XSGo5QTVLZ3A5Nm9wb2ZCamp5RnBNREJoU1ZHblo1XC8zalh5MWN1Rjh4Z0gwWENRZFBtUVZ1NGsrQVo2aGlEY1Nlb2lBUmx1UlVEWGQ4YTZ5WHBDMWMxcVJkUUtCbFNnU3p6cTMwcndwWFdSaGFMIn0%3D.
  49. Drift, SurveyMonkey, Salesforce und myclever (2018), The 2018 State of Chatbots Report, Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://www.drift.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2018-state-of-chatbots-report.pdf.
  50. Rauschnabel, P. A., Rossmann, A., & tom Dieck, M. C. (2017), An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go, Computers in human behavior, 76, 276–286.
  51. Ng, M., Coopamootoo, K. P., Toreini, E., Aitken, M., Elliot, K., & van Moorsel, A. (2020, September), Simulating the effects of social presence on trust, privacy concerns & usage intentions in automated bots for finance, In 2020 IEEE European symposium on security and privacy workshops (EuroS&PW), 190–199, IEEE.
  52. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011), PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  53. VNPT (2021), VNPT hỗ trợ giải đáp khách hàng 24/7 thông qua trợ lý ảo AMI. Retrieved 7/20/2024, from https://vnpt.com.vn/tu-van/vnpt-ho-tro-giai-dap-khach-hang-24-7-thong-qua-tro-ly-ao-ami.html.
  54. VNPT (2022), Chatbot liệu có thể thay đổi nhân sự ngành chăm sóc khách hàng trong tương lai?. Retrieved 7/20/2024, from https://vnpt.com.vn/tin-tuc/chatbot-lieu-co-the-thay-doi-nhan-su-nganh-cham-soc-khach-hang-trong-tuong-lai.html.
  55. Cherniak, K. (2024), BEST Chatbot statistics for 2024. Retrieved 20/7/2024, from https://masterofcode-com.translate.goog/blog/chatbot-statistics?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=vi&_x_tr_hl=vi&_x_tr_pto=sc.
  56. Dentsu Aegis Network (2018), More hearsay than dialogue: Dentsu Aegis Network explores communication between human and machine. Retrived 20/7/2024, from http://www.dentsuaegisnetwork.de/m/deDE/PDF/20180221_PM_Dentsu%20Aegis%20Network_Chatbot-Studie.pdf.
  57. Fittkau, Maaß Consulting (2017), Chatbots are rejected by every second online buyer. Retrived 20/7/2024, from http://www.fitt kaumaass.de/news/chatbots-von-jedem-zweiten-online-kaeufer-abgelehnt.
  58. Hill, J., Ford, W. R., Farreras, I. G. (2015), Real conversations with artificial intelligence: a comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations, Comput. Hum. Behav., 49, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.026.
  59. Bitkom (2017), One in Four Wants to Use Chatbots. Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/Jeder-Vierte-will-Chatbots-nutzen.html.
  60. Helpshift (2018), Challenges of Using Chatbots According to US Internet Users, May 2018. % of respondents. Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://www.emarketer.com/chart/219582/challenges-ofusing-chatbots.1%20von.
  61. CGS (2018), Global Consumer Customer Service Survey. Retrived 20/7/2024, from https://www.cgsinc.com/sites/default/files/media/resources/pdf/CGS_Consumer%2BCustServ%2Binfographic%2B2018.pdf.
  62. Trong, H., & Ngoc, C. N. M. (2008), Study materials for Research Data Analysis with SPSS, Volume 1. Ho Chi Minh City: Hong Duc.
  63. Mostafa, R. B., & Kasamani, T. (2022), Antecedents and consequences of chatbot initial trust, European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1748–1771.
  64. Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2017), Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103, 95–105.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Array