FACTORS AFFECTING CUSTOMERS’ ACCEPTANCE OF THE ADOPTION OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AT DONG A COMMERCIAL JOINT STOCK BANK, HUE BRANCH
Tập 129 Số 5A (2020), Nghiên cứu
Tập 129 Số 5A (2020)

FACTORS AFFECTING CUSTOMERS’ ACCEPTANCE OF THE ADOPTION OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AT DONG A COMMERCIAL JOINT STOCK BANK, HUE BRANCH

Nghiên cứu
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jed.v129i5A.5728
Đã xuất bản 2020-06-25
Duong Dac Quang Hao
University of Economics, Hue University
Tran Thai Hoa
Nguyen Huu Dung

Tóm tắt

Abstract: This study aims to develop and test the integrative model of the factors affecting customers’ acceptance intention of the adoption of blockchain technology. Data were collected from a sample of 195 customers who have been conducting transactions at Dong A Bank – Hue branch. Samples are selected by using the systematic random sampling method. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is used to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings indicate that six out of eight tested relationships are supported. Perceived usefulness (PU) and Perceived ease of use (PEU) are the most critical factors affecting customers’ Attitude (AT). Attitude also has a direct and positive correlation to customers’ acceptance Intention (IN). Notably, Personal characteristics (PC) and Risk perception (RP) are the two most influential factors affecting Perceived usefulness. And, the Perceived ease of use factor is only affected by customers’ Self-command (SC). In general, this study contributes to enriching the existing knowledge of blockchain adoption in banks and helps banks figure out an efficient way to adopt blockchain technology.

Keywords: customers’ acceptance, blockchain adoption, Dong A Bank, Hue branch

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jed.v129i5A.5728
PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991), The theory of planned behaviour, Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  2. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Massachusetts, USA.
  3. Ahram, T., Sargolzaei, A., Sargolzaei, S., Daniels, J. & Amaba, B. (2017, June), Blockchain technology innovations, In 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) (137–141), IEEE.
  4. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006), 17.0 user’s guide. In Crawfordville, FL. Amos Development Corporation.
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D. & Warshaw, P. R. (1992), Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage, Human Relations, 45(7), 659–686.
  7. G. Moore and I. Benbasat, Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation (1991), Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 192–222.
  8. Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Janssen, M. & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019), Perceived usefulness, ease of use and user acceptance of blockchain technology for digital transactions–insights from user-generated content on Twitter, Enterprise Information Systems, 13(6), 771–800.
  9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009), Análise multivariada de dados, Bookman editora.
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998), Multivariate data analysis, 5(3), 207–219, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
  11. Johansen, S. K. (2018), A comprehensive literature review on the Blockchain as a technological enabler for innovation, Dept. of Information Systems, Mannheim University, Germany, 1–29.
  12. Lindman, J., Tuunainen, V. K. & Rossi, M. (2017), Opportunities and Risks of Blockchain Technologies–a research agenda, the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA.
  13. Shah, T., & Jani, S. (2018), Applications of blockchain technology in banking & finance, Parul CUniversity, Vadodara, India.
  14. Lomax, Richard G., and Randall E. Schumacker (2004), A beginner's guide to structural equation modelling, psychology press, United Kingdom.
  15. Lundqvist, T., de Blanche, A. & Andersson, H. R. H. (2017, June), Thing-to-thing electricity micropayments using blockchain technology, In 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) (1–6), Switzerland, IEEE.
  16. MacDonald, T. J., Allen, D. W. & Potts, J. (2016), Blockchains and the boundaries of self-organized economies: Predictions for the future of banking, In Banking beyond banks and money (279–296), Springer, Cham.
  17. Pavlou, P. A. (2003), Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
  18. Shah, T., & Jani, S. (2018), Applications of blockchain technology in banking & finance, Parul CUniversity, Vadodara, India.
  19. Staples, M., Chen, S., Falamaki, S., Ponomarev, A., Rimba, P., Tran, A. B., ... & Zhu, J. (2017), Risks and opportunities for systems using blockchain and smart contracts, Data61, CSIRO), Sydney.
  20. Suh, B. & Han, I. (2003), The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce, International Journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 135–161.
  21. Weber, I., Xu, X., Riveret, R., Governatori, G., Ponomarev, A. & Mendling, J. (2016, September), Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain, In International Conference on Business Process Management (329–347), Springer, Cham, Austria.
  22. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S. & Smolander, K. (2016), Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review, PloS one, 11(10), e0163477.
  23. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X. & Wang, H. (2017, June), An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends, In 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData Congress), 557–564, USA, IEEE.
  24. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. & Xu, X. (2012), Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS quarterly, 157–178.