WHETHER INDIVIDUALISM MAKES PEOPLE FROM THE “WEST” HAPPIER AND COLLECTIVISM MAKES PEOPLE FROM THE “EAST” MORE SATISFIED IN LIFE: AN INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL ANALYSIS
PDF

Keywords

Individualism
Collectivism
Subjective Well-being
Happiness
Social Values

Abstract

Determinants of the variation of happiness have long been discussed in social sciences. Recent studies have focused on investigating cultural factors contributing to the level of individual happiness, in which the cultural dimension of individualism (IND) and collectivism (COL) has been drawing the attention of a large number of scholars. At the cultural level of analysis, happiness is associated with personal achievements as well as personal egoism in individualistic cultures, while it is related to interpersonal relationships in collectivistic cultures. Empirical research yields unconventional results at the individual level of analysis, that is, individuals in collectivistic cultures favor IND to be happy, in contrast, people in individualistic cultures emphasize COL be satisfied in life. Using data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey (WVS), this study takes the cultural dimension of IND and COL at the individual level of analysis to detect its effects on happiness (conceptualized as subjective well-being – SWB) in the comparison between the two cultures. Multiple linear regression models reveal results that individuals from the “West” experience greater happiness when they expose themselves less individualist, while, individuals from the “East” feel more satisfied and happier in their life when they emphasize more on IND or being more autonomous.
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jssh.v128i6B.5145
PDF

References

  1. R. Inglehart, R. Foa, C. Peterson, and C. Welzel, “Development, Freesom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981-2007),” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 264–285, 2008.
  2. A. C. Ahuvia, “Individualism/Collectivism and Cultures of Happinness: a Theoretical Conjecture on the Relationship Between Consumption, Culture and Subjective Well-Being At the National Level,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2002.
  3. Y. Uchida and S. Oishi, “The Happiness of Individuals and the Collective,” Jpn. Psychol. Res., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 125–141, 2016.
  4. Y. Ogihara and Y. Uchida, “Does individualism bring happiness? Negative effects of individualism on interpersonal relationships and happiness,” Front. Psychol., vol. 5, p. 135, 2014.
  5. L. G. Steele and S. M. Lynch, “The Pursuit of Happiness in China: Individualism, Collectivism, and Subjective Well-Being During China’s Economic and Social Transformation,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 441–451, 2013.
  6. R. Kim and P. T. Coleman, “The Combined Effect of Individualism – Collectivism on Conflict Styles and Satisfaction : An Analysis at the Individual Level,” Peace Confl. Stud., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 137–159, 2015.
  7. D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon, and M. Kemmelmeier, “Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 3–72, 2002.
  8. M. J. Gelfand, H. C. Triandis, and D. K. S. Chan, “Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism?,” Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 397–410, 1996.
  9. H. C. Triandis, Individualism and collectivism. Routledge, 2018.
  10. K. Yoon, “Political Culture of Individualism and Collectivism,” 2010.
  11. A. Rego and M. P. Cunha, “How individualism-collectivism orientations predict happiness in a collectivistic context,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 2009.
  12. R. Veenhoven, “QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN INDIVIDUALISTIC SOCIETY: A comparison of 43 nations in the early 1990 ’ s,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 48, pp. 157–186, 1999.
  13. R. Nisbett, The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently... and why. Simon and Schuster, 2004.
  14. T. Brambor, W. R. Clark, and M. Golder, “Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses,” Polit. Anal., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–82, 2006.