THÁI ĐỘ CỦA HỌC SINH ĐỐI VỚI MÔN TOÁN THAY ĐỔI TÍCH CỰC TRONG MÔI TRƯỜNG LỚP HỌC ĐẢO NGƯỢC
Vol. 133 No. 6C (2024), Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Huế: Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn
Vol. 133 No. 6C (2024)

THÁI ĐỘ CỦA HỌC SINH ĐỐI VỚI MÔN TOÁN THAY ĐỔI TÍCH CỰC TRONG MÔI TRƯỜNG LỚP HỌC ĐẢO NGƯỢC

Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Huế: Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v133i6C.7298
Published 2024-07-29
Thi Nga Pham
NCS khoa Toan Hue university

Abstract

Abstract: Students' attitudes toward mathematics are important to many aspects of mathematics education because they allow students to evaluate their own knowledge, feelings, and behaviors. Previous studies have shown that attitudes towards mathematics play an important role in determining academic achievement and that students with positive attitudes tend to have higher performance. The purpose of the study is to propose a flexible flipped classroom model (FFC) - a student-centered cooperative teaching strategy that combines online and face-to-face teaching with the support of technology, to create opportunities to change attitudes in a more positive direction for high school students. We illustrate the FFC model with a unit of work on measures of central tendency (Grade 10 high school program 2018). Results show that students’ attitudes increase in four out of five subscales of attitudes and the changes are statistically significant. Suggestions and discussions about designing flip classrooms and measuring attitudes are included.

Key words: flipped classroom, attitude, flexible flipped classroom model.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v133i6C.7298
PDF

References

  1. Ajisuksmo, C. R. P., & Saputri, G. R. (2017). The influence of attitudes towards mathematics, and metacognitive awareness on mathematics achievements. Creative education, 8, 486-497. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.83037
  2. Guner, N. (2012). Using metaphor analysis to explore high school students’ attitudes towards learning mathematics. Education, 133, 39-48.
  3. Rice, L., Barth, J. M., Guadagno, R. E., Smith, G. P. A., & McCallum, D. M. (2013). The role of social support in students’ perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 42, 1028-1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9801-8
  4. Yang, X. (2015). Rural junior secondary school students’ perceptions of classroom learning environments and their attitude and achievement in mathematics in West China. Learning Environments Research. 18(2), 249–266.
  5. Farrell, (2006). The first year of language teaching: Imposing order. System, 34, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.12.001
  6. Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematic.
  7. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of fipped classroom challenges in K–12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4), 1–22.
  8. He, J. (2020). Research and practice of fipped classroom teaching mode based on guidance case. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2337–2352.
  9. Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78-80.
  10. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A., (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  11. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled “A review of flipped learning” Arlington. VA: Flipped Learning Network.
  12. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed). 269–322. New York: McGraw-Hill Fellows, M.M.
  13. Jacobs, J. E., Davis-Kean, P., Bleeker, M., Eccles, J.S., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). I can but I don’t want to. in Gallagher, A.M., & Kaufman, J.C. (Eds.) Gender Differences in Mathematics. 246 – 263. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005.
  15. Tran, D., & Javed, S, (2017). Examining non-traditional pathways preservice teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the mathematics Education research group of Australasia, Clayton, Victoria, Australia (pp. 503¬–516).
  16. Bakar, A.K., Tarmizi, A. R., Mahuyddin, R., (2010). Relationships between university students’ achievement motivation, attitude and academic performance in Malaysia. 2(2):4906-4910 DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.793
  17. Song, Y., & Kapur, M. (2017), How to Flip the Classroom – “Productive failure or traditional flipped classroom” pedagogical design? Educational Technology & Society, 292-305.
  18. Davadas, S. D., & Lay, Y. (2018). Factors affecting students’ attitude toward mathematics: A structural equation modeling approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2018 14(1):517-529.
  19. Lim, S. Y., & Chapman, E. (2013). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics: An International Journal, 82, 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9414-x
  20. Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. II, (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, 16-21.
  21. Reid, N. (2006). Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1): 3-27.