APPLYING 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY IN EXPLORING TOPIC AREA OF FLAT SHAPE
PDF (Vietnamese)

Keywords

3D printing, flat shape, area. Công nghệ in 3D, hình phẳng, diện tích.

Abstract

3D printing technology is becoming increasingly popular and is being practically applied in many fields. In education, 3D printing technology can make the content of subjects in general, and mathematics in particular, livelier and more intuitive. With the support of this technology, teachers can transform abstract, difficult-to-understand mathematical knowledge into content that learners can relatively easily grasp through real models. This paper presents the application of 3D printing technology in supporting the teaching and learning of the topic "Area of Flat Shapes". The research results show that during the pedagogical experiment, students actively participated in assigned tasks such as measuring and calculating results on 3D printed models, thereby discovering characteristics and properties to solve the problems. Additionally, through the exploration, students also gained a visual understanding related to the concept of integrals - a highly abstract concept in mathematics.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v135i6A.7576
PDF (Vietnamese)

References

  1. Airish P. Pelemeniano, Marvin H. Siega (2023), Integrating Mathematical Modeling of Real-Life Problems: A Contextualized Approach to Developing Instructional Material in Basic Calculus, International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp 149-163
  2. Akyol, C., Uygur, M. & Yanpar-Yelken, T. (2022), 3D Printers as an Educational Tool in Gifted Education: Effective Use, Problems and Suggestions, Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(2), p173-205, DOI:10.17478/jegys.1105484.
  3. Asempapa, R. S., & Love, T. S. (2021), Teaching math modeling through 3D-printing: Examining the influence of an integrative professional development, School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), p85 - 95, DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12448.
  4. B. Redwood, Schoffer F. & Garret B. (2017), The 3D printing handbook: technologies, design and applications, 3D Hubs B.V. 2017.
  5. Dilling F. & Witzke I. (2018), 3D-Printing – Technology in Mathematics education – Examples from the caculus, University of Siegen, Germany, p54-58.
  6. Dilling, F., Witzke, I. (2020), The Use of 3D-Printing Technology in Calculus Education: Concept Formation Processes of the Concept of Derivative with Printed Graphs of Functions, Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, p320–339. DOI: 10.1007/s40751-020-00062-8.
  7. Ford S., Minshall T. (2017), 3D printing in teaching and education: A review of where and how it is used, The Engineering and Physical Sceinces Research Council, p1-43.
  8. Ha, O., & Fang, N. (2013), Development of interactive 3D tangible models as teaching aids to improve students' spatial ability in STEM education, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference.
  9. Halverscheid, S. & Labs, O. (2019), Felix Klein’s mathematical heritage seen through 3D models, In Weigand H.-G. et al. (Eds), The Legacy of Felix Klein, p131-152, ICME-13, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99386-7.
  10. Huleihil M. (2017), 3D printing technology as innovative tool for math and geometry teaching applications, 5th Global Conference on Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 164 (2017) 012023, DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/164/1/012023.
  11. Novak E. & Wisdom S. (2020), Using 3D Printing in Science for Elementary Teachers, In Joel J. M. and Emily M. W. (Eds.), Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice. Springer.
  12. OECD. (2023), PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework, in PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI:10.1787/7ea9ee19-en.
  13. Patrick Griffin, Barry McGaw, Esther Care (2012), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (p. 36). Dordrecht: Springer, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6.
  14. Shahrubudina N., Leea T. C., Ramlan R. (2019), An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications, 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials Processing and Manufacturing (SMPM 2019), Procedia Manufacturing 35, p1286–1296.
  15. Skedsmo, G., & Huber, S. G. (2019), Top-down and bottom-up approaches to improve educational quality: their intended and unintended consequences, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31, p1-4.