PRIMARY TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS CLIL INTEGRATION IN FAMILY AND FRIENDS TEXTBOOK SERIES
PDF

Keywords

CLIL, teacher attitudes, primary education, Family and Friends National Edition, ABC model CLIL
thái độ của giáo viên
giáo dục tiểu học
Giáo trình Family & Friends
mô hình thái độ ABC

Abstract

This study surveyed the attitudes of 119 primary English teachers in Southern Vietnam towards the integration of the Content and Language Integration (CLIL) approach through the Family and Friends National Edition. A mix method was used; data were collected through a 24-item questionnaire based on the 4Cs framework (Content, Communication, Cognition, Culture) and analyzed according to the ABC model (Affective, Behavioral, Cognitive), combined with semi-structured interviews. The quantitative results showed that teachers generally had positive attitudes towards the CLIL approach, demonstrated by high Mean values ​​in all three components, but there was still a certain variation between groups of teachers, reflected by high SD indexes. Qualitative data revealed three key themes that influenced teachers’ attitudes and readiness for implementation: (1) the attractiveness and relevance of CLIL topics, (2) teachers’ scaffoldings and their emphasis on the four pillars (4Cs) and (3) issues related to policy and implementation. The findings showed that teachers’ attitudes were closely linked to the feasibility of CLIL implementation; in particular, the sustainability of integration depended on ongoing professional development, clear pedagogical guidance, and appropriate institutional support from management.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v135i6B.8116
PDF

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
  3. Banegas, D. L., & Zappa-Hollman, S. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173151
  4. Bui, L. D. T., & Truong, T. T. N. (2020). CLIL in primary English lessons: Teachers' perspectives. Language Education in Asia, 6(2), 90-106. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288886773_CLIL_in_Primary_English_Lessons_Teachers'_Perspectives
  5. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
  6. Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
  7. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/vn/cambridgeenglish/catalog/teacher-training-development-and-research/clil/clil-content-and-language-integrated-learning?isbn=9780521130219&format=PB
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  9. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20
  10. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
  11. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  12. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan Education. Retrieved from https://ia903202.us.archive.org/1/items/284060456-uncovering-clil-1-pdf/284060456-Uncovering-CLIL-1-pdf.pdf
  13. Mohammed, T. A., & Pandhiani, S. M. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting student evaluation of teaching effectiveness in Saudi higher education: The case of Jubail University College. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-5-2
  14. Morton, T. (2018). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers' knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
  15. Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. H. (2024). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in Vietnam: Challenges and solutions. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5246
  16. Nguyen, H. T. M., Nguyen, H. T. T., Gao, X., Hoang, T. H., & Starfield, S. (2023). Developing professional capacity for content language integrated learning (CLIL) teaching in Vietnam: Tensions and responses. Language and Education, 38(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2260374
  17. Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
  18. Sahragard, R., & Rahimi, S. A. (2018). Textbook evaluation of Family and Friends series based on teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 68-85. Retrieved from https://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/800/pdf800
  19. Tran, C. B. N., & Truong, V. A. (2023a). Family and Friends – National Edition: English 1 (Teacher’s Book). Vietnam Education Publishing House, in association with Oxford University Press.
  20. Tran, C. B. N., & Truong, V. A. (2023b). Family and Friends – National Edition: Teacher’s Guide. Vietnam Education Publishing House in association with Oxford University Press.