Abstract
Washback, or the effects of tests on learning and teaching, is one of the important test qualities (Bachman & Palmer, 1996). There have been a few empirical studies on the washback of different tests on different stakeholders and their actions under the test use such as those by Brown (1997), Cheng (1997), McKinley & Thompson (2018), Nguyen (2017), Pizarro (2010), Shih (2009), Xu & Liu (2018), to name but a few. The results of such studies have shown that the washback of different tests varies in terms of mechanism, direction, and intensity of teaching and learning. This study explores the washback of the high-stakes English tests in the Vietnamese National High School Graduation Exam on the teaching of EFL high school teachers. Six teachers, who were teaching English to students at grade 12 in the research site of Buon Ma Thuot City (Dak Lak Province, Vietnam) were purposefully selected for the study. As a case study, the research employed was a two-phase explanatory design with the use of a questionnaire and follow-up interviews. The findings reveal that various aspects of teaching, such as the teachers’ choices of textbook coverage, time allotment for teaching content, provision of extracurricular content, in-class assessment tasks, their choices of teaching methods, application of new teaching techniques, choices of classroom organization and language for instructions were affected by the high—stakes English tests. In addition, the study discloses the unique teacher factors of the participants under the influence of the tests.
References
- Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2012). A review of pedagogical implications of examination
- washback. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(7), 11-21.
- Ahmed, N. (2015). The washback effects of teaching academics IELTS on Emirati
- students’ language proficiency at a technical high school in Abu Dhabi. The
- British University in Dubai, Dubai.
- Amrein, A., & Berliner, D. (2002a). An analysis of some unintended and negative
- consequences of high stakes testing. East Lansing, MI: The Great Lakes
- Center for Education Research and Practice. Retrieved from
- https://nepc.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf
- Alderson, J. D., & Wall, D, (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics,
- (2), 115-129.
- Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, UK:
- Oxford University Press.
- Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in
- language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257-279.
- Barnes, M (2017). Washback: Exploring what constitutes “good” teaching practices.
- Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Elsevier Ltd.
- Brown, J. D. (1997). The washback effect of language tests. University of Hawaii
- Working Papers in ESL, 16(1), 27-45.
- Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong
- Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.
- Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. J., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language
- testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaym.
- Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of
- testing on teaching and learning. Retrieved from
- https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED442280.pdf
- Cholis, H. & Rizqi, F. (2018). Senior high school English teachers’ perceptions
- on a high-stakes test (SBMPTN): A washback study. International Journal
- of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(3), 47-52. doi:
- 7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.47
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th
- ed.). London: Routledge.
- Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. International Journal of
- English Studies, 13(2), 39-51. Print ISSN: 1578-7044; Online
- ISSN: 1989-6131.
- Herman, L. J. & Golan, S. (1991). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and
- learning- Another look. National Center for Research on Evaluation.
- Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished manuscript. University of Reading, England. Standards and Student Testing.
- Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd edition). Cambridge
- University Press. Retrieved from
- http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam034/2003268576.pdf
- Hsu, H-F. (2009). The impact of implementing English proficiency tests as a
- graduation requirement at Taiwanese university of technology. University of
- York. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/40039368.pdf
- Larsen-Freeman, D. & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques & principles in language
- teaching (3rd edition). Oxford University Press.
- Liauh, Y-H.E. (20111). A study of the perceptions of English faculty and students of
- exit English examinations at Taiwan’s technological and vocational higher
- Education Institutions. Graduate student theses, Dissertations & Professional Papers. 1331. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1331
- McKinley, J. & Thompson, F. (2018). Washback effect in teaching English as an
- international language. TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching.
- Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language testing.
- Retrieved at https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-96-17.pdf
- Nguyen, Thuong. (2017). Vietnam’s National Foreign Language 2020 Project after
- years: A Difficult Stage. The International Academic Forum. Retrieved
- from: https://bit.ly/3ozaUQ9
- Nguyen, H. & Gu, Y. (2020). Impact of TOEIC Listening and Reading as a
- university exit test in Vietnam. Language Assessment Quarter, DOI:
- 1080/15434303.2020.1722672
- Newman, W.L. (2000). Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn &Bacon.
- Onaiba, E-M. & Mustaf, A. (2014). Investigating the washback effect of a revised
- EFL public examination on teachers’ instructional practices, materials, and
- curriculum. University of Leicester. Thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/2381/28561
- Pizarro, M. A. (2010). Exploring the washback effects of a high-stakes English test on the teaching of English
- in Spanish upper secondary schools. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Inglese, 23(2010), 149-170.
- Richard, C.J. (2006). Communicative language leaching today. New York:
- Cambridge University Press.
- Shih, C. M. (2009). How tests change teaching: A model for reference. English
- teaching: Practice and critique, 8(2), 188-206. Retrieved at
- http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2009v8n2dial1.pdf
- Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited:
- washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13(3), 298–317. Retrieved at
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300305
- Smith, M. K. (2018). ‘What is teaching?’. In The encyclopedia of pedagogy and
- informal education. Retrieved at https://infed.org/mobi/what-is-teaching/
- Sukyadi, D. & Mardiani, R. (2011). The washback effect of the English national
- examination (ENE) on English teachers’ classroom teaching and students’
- learning. Kata, 13(1), 96-111.
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
- Watanabe, Y. (2013). The national center test for university admissions. Language
- testing, 30 (4), 565-573.
- Vietnamese
- Nguyễn Thúy Lan. (2017). Một số tác động của bài thi đánh giá năng lực tiếng Anh
- theo chuẩn đầu ra đối với việc dạy tiếng Anh tại trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ-
- Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 33 (4), 122-136