ASSESSING ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS: HIGH SCHOOL EFL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES
Tập 129 Số 6B (2020), Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Tập 129 Số 6B (2020)

ASSESSING ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS: HIGH SCHOOL EFL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jssh.v129i6B.5425
Đã xuất bản 2020-05-28
Nguyễn Thị Hồng Duyên
HUE UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

Tóm tắt

On the implementation level of the National Foreign Language Project for the period 2008 – 2020, now expanded to 2025 in Vietnam, Level 3/6 – VNFR (B1- CEFR) has been set as the learning outcomes for high school learners. Aiming at achieving this goal, EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices of assessing language learners are of great importance. Guiding documents have been launched officially supporting EFL teachers in implementing effective assessment of language learners and achieving the required learning outcomes. This paper reports the findings of high school EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices of assessing language learners in the central city of Vietnam. From the findings, practical suggestions are made with the hope to provide valuable basis for both learning improvement and teaching development.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jssh.v129i6B.5425
PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. (1996). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2015). Teachers’beliefs about assessment. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 284–300). New York, NY: Routledge.
  3. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. HongKong: HongKong Univerity Press.
  4. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.
  5. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 3–12.
  6. Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301-318.
  7. Brown, G.T.L., Kennedy, K.J., Fok, P.K., Chan, J.K.S., & Yu, W.M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347-363.
  8. Brumen, M. & Cagran, B. (2011). Comparative assessment of young learners’ foreign language competence in three Eastern European countries. Education, 39(5), 541-559.
  9. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of research on educational psychology, (709-725). New York: Macmillan.
  10. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action. London: Falmer Press.
  11. Clark, C. & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. Handbook of Research on teaching. NewYork, MacMillan, 255-296.
  12. Chan, Y. (2008). Elementary school EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of multiple assessments. Reflections on English language teaching. 7(1), pp.37 – 62.
  13. Deneen, C., & Boud, D. (2014). Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 577–591.
  14. Gipps, C. and Pickering, A. (2010). Assessment for learning: Formative Approaches. In Arthur, J. and Cremin, T. (eds). Learning to teach in the primary school. London and NewYork: Routledge.
  15. Hampton, S. (1994). Teacher change: overthrowing the myth of one teacher, one classroom. In T. Shanahan (ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing (122-140). Illinois: NCRE.
  16. Heaton, J. (1990). Writing English language tests. New York: Longman. Inc.
  17. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, (27), 65-90.
  19. Kuzborska, K. (2011). Links between teachers’ beliefs and practices and research on reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. April 2011, 23 (1),102–128.
  20. McKay, P. (2006). Assessing Young Language Learners. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  21. MOET. (2008). Decision No. 1400/QD-TTg Approval of the Project “ Teaching and learning foreign languages in the national educational system for the 2008-2020 period”. Hanoi.
  22. MOET. (2011). Circular No. 58/2011/TT-BGDĐT – Regulations of assessment and ranking for high school learners. Hanoi.
  23. MOET. (2012). The pilot English language teaching program – Issued together with Decision No. 5209/QĐ-BGDĐT by MOET dated 23rd Nov, 2012. Hanoi.
  24. MOET. (2013). Dispatch No. 2205/BGDĐT-GDTrH - Guidance to the implementation of pilot English teaching program for high school students from the school year 2013-2014. Hanoi.
  25. MOET. (2014). Circular No. 5333/BGDĐT-GDTrH - Regulations of English language assessment for high school learners in the school year 2013 - 2014. Hanoi.
  26. Ndalichako, J.L. (2014). Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment. International Journal Of Information and Education Technology, 5(5), May 2015.
  27. Opre, D. (2015). Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (209), 229 – 233.
  28. Shaaban, K. (2001). Assessment of Young Learners. English Teaching Forum, 39(4), 16-20.
  29. Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research (51), 455-498.
  30. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  31. Tittle, C.K. (1994). Toward and educational psychology of assessment for teaching and learning: Theories, contexts, and validation arguments. Educational Psychologist, 29, 149-162.
  32. Wilson, R. J. (2000). A model of assessment-in-practice. In Cheng, L., Rogers, T., and Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21 (3), 360-389.