Thực hành kiểm tra đánh giá thường xuyên sinh viên tiếng Anh không chuyên ngữ
Tập 135 Số 6B (2026), Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Tập 135 Số 6B (2026)

Thực hành kiểm tra đánh giá thường xuyên sinh viên tiếng Anh không chuyên ngữ

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v135i6B.7899
Đã xuất bản 2026-07-28
  • Nguyen Thi Hong Duyen
  • Viet Dao Nguyen
Nguyen Thi Hong Duyen
Viet Dao Nguyen

Tóm tắt

In the implementation of the National Foreign Language Project for the period 2008 – 2020, now extended to 2025 in Vietnam, level 3/6 - VNFLPF  (B1- CEFR) has been set as the learning outcomes for non-English major students. The implementation of this policy has brought about reforms in the general English curriculum, teaching materials, and assessment practices, which aimed at achieving the required learning outcomes. This paper reports the findings from an investigation into EFL teachers’ formative assessment practices of assessing non-English major students in a city in Central Vietnam using interviews, classroom observations and assessment samples. The study reveals some formative assessment tools commonly used by EFL teachers and factors affecting EFL teachers’ formative assessment practice. From the findings, practical suggestions on formative assessment practices are made with the hope of providing a valuable basis for both teaching and learning improvement.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v135i6B.7899
PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  2. Bezzina, S., Pleiffer, A., & Dingli, A. (2021). AI-enabled gamification for learning and assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning and Educational Technology (pp. 189–193).
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  4. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
  5. Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
  6. Cizek, G. J., & Rachor, R. E. (1996). Teachers’ assessment practice: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159–179.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  8. Cross, L. H., & Weber, L. J. (1993). Testing and grading practice and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 23–30.
  9. Delgado, H. O. K., de Azevedo Fay, A., Sebastiany, M. J., & Silva, A. D. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence adaptive learning tools. BELT: Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 11(2), e38749. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2020.2.38749
  10. DiCerbo, K. (2021). Why not go all in with artificial intelligence? In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-computer interaction: Theoretical approaches and design methods. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 12763, pp. 361–369). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78224-5_25
  11. Enu, J. (2021). Factors affecting teacher educators’ adoption of formative assessment strategies in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(4), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i4.20341
  12. Eshun, I. & Bordoh, A. (2024). Factors influencing formative assessment practices of junior high school social studies teachers. Innovare Journal of Education, 12(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i1.49794
  13. Fan, S., & Lan, C. (2019). Developing classroom-based assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 112–122.
  14. Fulmer, G. W. & Lee, I. C. H. (2019). Relationships among Singaporean secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment and school and policy contextual factors. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1336427
  15. Gipps, C., & Pickering, A. (2010). Assessment for learning: Formative approaches. In J. Arthur & T. Cremin (Eds.), Learning to teach in the primary school (pp. 152–166). London & New York: Routledge.
  16. Gullickson, A. R. (1985). Student evaluation techniques and their relationship to grade and curriculum. Journal of Educational Research, 79(2), 96–100.
  17. Hargreaves, A. (1992). Time and teachers’ work: an analysis of the intensification thesis. Teachers College Record, 94(1), 87-108
  18. Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial
  19. intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher
  20. education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722WE-ScienceCitationIndexExpanded
  21. Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(2), 93-99.
  22. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009
  23. Kahn, E. A. (2000). A case study of assessment in a grade 10 English course. Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 276–286.
  24. Kanjee, A., & Mthembu, J. (2015). Assessment literacy of foundation phase teachers: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(1), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i1.354
  25. Le, N. T. (2015). The context of assessment in EFL classroom in two high schools in Vietnam Doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland. University of Queensland eSpace.
  26. Lee, A. V. Y. (2023). Supporting students’ generation of feedback in large scale online courses with artificial intelligence–enabled evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 77, Article 101250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101250
  27. McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20–32.
  28. MOET (2008). Decision No. 1400/QD-TTg: Approval of the project "Teaching and learning foreign languages in the national educational system for the 2008–2020 period". Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.
  29. Ochour, B. K., Opoku-Afriyie, P., & Eshun, I. (2022). Formative assessment conceptions and practices of junior high school social studies teachers in the Techiman Municipality of Ghana. Universal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 273–290. https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/ujssh/article/view/557
  30. Pham, T. H. N., & Nguyen, V. Q. N. (2014). Primary EFL teachers’ practice of assessing young language learners and the implications for assessment policy in Vietnam. Proceedings of testing and assessment for school-aged language learners. July, 2014. Hue City.
  31. Pham, T. N. A., Pham, V. Q. N., & Nguyen, H. H. T. (2019). Vietnamese EFL teachers’ classroom assessment practice at the implementation of the pilot primary curriculum. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 172-177.
  32. Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (2000). Authentic assessment of the young child. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  33. Rahman, F. (2011). Assessment and feedback practices in the English language classroom. Journal of NELTA, 16(1), 97-106.
  34. Sardareh, S. A. (2013). Iranian secondary school EFL teachers’ assessment beliefs and roles. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 1638-1647.
  35. Shaaban, K. A. (2001). Assessment of young students. English Teaching Forum, 39(4), 16–20.
  36. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  37. Ummah, L. K., & Bisriyah, M. (2022). EFL students’ perception of Grammarly’s feedback and how they deal with the inaccuracy. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i2.1687
  38. Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
  39. Yildirim, A. (2004). Student assessment in high-school social-studies courses in Turkey: Teachers' and students' perceptions. International Review of Education, 50(2), 157-175.